ruzzyruffy Posted August 23, 2016 Report Posted August 23, 2016 Hello~ Me again, in the suggestion thread again. :3 Well today, i'm suggesting a PvP tournament ?.. I know that we have the PvP rooms, and the for_fild01. But.. Its all barbaric, and stuff.. i mean, its either a team effort, or.. 1 against everyone? Well, I'm suggesting an arena style pvp, where the players have to sign up, to join. then moved to a map, where there's only 2 contenders. I hope you are still following me on this. Then, other players, who are waiting to get paired up, can watch the match, or just wait in the waiting room. Rules will be applied, (what ever they will be) Time limited Matches Rewarding Matches PvP Arena ladders Champion Title ? (being creative here)
Rayray Posted August 23, 2016 Report Posted August 23, 2016 Would be hard to manage and there are certain classes that would be a bit OP in a 1v1 situation against certain classes, which means this would promote usage of only select classes.We tried this on our own in the past. Stalker and clown would be the favorites to win it. The random matching will make it not fun if you get matched to a class that you absolutely can't defeat in a timed situation(i assume the battle will be timed) like a ninja vs a sniper. I say timed situation because we did one where there is no time limit and all the stalker had to do is wait for the FCP to run out to auto win. Not fun if you ask me.
ruzzyruffy Posted August 23, 2016 Author Report Posted August 23, 2016 (edited) Would be hard to manage and there are certain classes that would be a bit OP in a 1v1 situation against certain classes, which means this would promote usage of only select classes. We tried this on our own in the past. Stalker and clown would be the favorites to win it. The random matching will make it not fun if you get matched to a class that you absolutely can't defeat in a timed situation(i assume the battle will be timed) like a ninja vs a sniper. I say timed situation because we did one where there is no time limit and all the stalker had to do is wait for the FCP to run out to auto win. Not fun if you ask me. True, but wouldn't that be the challenge? to overcome the best of the best? there's a lot of variables in a one on one match, they can take advantage of their environment or something.. Well there are rules applied, we could say, no recovery items allowed (berry, seed , etc). and its time limited, ( 1 minute to take out your opponent), but I have to disagree, i think the random matching is what makes it exciting, OR we could match them up per class.. so e.g champ vs champ, or something. The point of this pvp, is not only muscles, but also wits? (creative thinking here) but, yeah, its just an opinion of mine, would it work like that? Edited August 23, 2016 by ruzzyruffy
Rayray Posted August 23, 2016 Report Posted August 23, 2016 True, but wouldn't that be the challenge? to overcome the best of the best? there's a lot of variables in a one on one match, they can take advantage of their environment or something.. Well there are rules applied, we could say, no recovery items allowed (berry, seed , etc). and its time limited, ( 1 minute to take out your opponent), but I have to disagree, i think the random matching is what makes it exciting, OR we could match them up per class.. so e.g champ vs champ, or something. The point of this pvp, is not only muscles, but also wits? (creative thinking here) but, yeah, its just an opinion of mine, would it work like that? No recovery items, that would make long range classes with tons of damage the best character to use then? Or a fat LK/paladin. And you really cant call it a challenge. the one playing ninja against a sniper will have no problem, while the sniper is terribly disadvantaged. There are actually less variables in a 1v1 match. Equipment would be first, class would be second, then the actual player itself. 1 minute to take out an enemy? Most players on characters with high hp can last longer than that. what happens then? A draw? If that is the case, then we would be having 80% of the matches end up in a draw. 1
Nas Posted August 23, 2016 Report Posted August 23, 2016 This is about class disadvantage. Like ray said(ninja vs sniper) sniper just end up burn his seed while ninja just have to flip+throw kunai/flip+FS. Unless if this tournament term you can only duel with same class, then it will be little fun and challenge.
test. Posted August 23, 2016 Report Posted August 23, 2016 This is about class disadvantage. Like ray said(ninja vs sniper) sniper just end up burn his seed while ninja just have to flip+throw kunai/flip+FS. Unless if this tournament term you can only duel with same class, then it will be little fun and challenge. like bio vs. erryone lol broke armor = 0% chance of winning
Rayray Posted August 23, 2016 Report Posted August 23, 2016 like bio vs. erryone lol broke armor = 0% chance of winning not that hard really, i always carry an rsx+gr armor even if I am a bio. Stalker is worse, full strip will just annoy and finish the fight for you against all classes that is not a bio or a dex class or a paladin.
ruzzyruffy Posted August 23, 2016 Author Report Posted August 23, 2016 Then, what about a 5 on 5 ? XD
Nas Posted August 23, 2016 Report Posted August 23, 2016 Battle royale is party vs party xD but nowadays its like guild v guild on party vs party.
qperteplex Posted August 23, 2016 Report Posted August 23, 2016 -1 to 1v1 as it will only be favorable to a certain class. We already have a group PVP event, LTS, but is rarely held. These are not automated events if I recall correctly.
ruzzyruffy Posted August 23, 2016 Author Report Posted August 23, 2016 we could randomize the party, but like, each party will get 1 class each . but still a 5 on 5.
buangka Posted August 23, 2016 Report Posted August 23, 2016 after woe i hope gvg will be held for more guild doing pvp at ground
