Devotion

It's going in rejected/completed, and classified as "completed"

http://forum.forsaken-ro.net/index.php?showtopic=14383 If we can't get babies into normal PvP rooms, we'll consider this. On hold for now.

Sorry, but this idea has bad written all over it.

Am I the only one who's considered that having a second WoE a week for the European castle but on Asian time would mean it would be difficult for any one guild to have it for more than one WoE? It's like making one American WoE a week on European time; they'd likely lose their castles. Competition is good but this would just be unfair to European guilds, no? It would be better to take an American WoE castle and make a separate WoE for it on Asian time. Not sure what percent of our population would mind this.

http://forum.forsaken-ro.net/index.php?showtopic=15645 Please.

In that case, did you know there are more Canadians than Europeans or Asians on Fro? ^_^

Anyways... I said last week in another topic that we're not adding another castle anytime soon; we want a significant population increase. But I fully agree that the next castle should be Asian WoE. How about Canadian WoE. That's me joking....(sort of)

A good champion can and has killed me in one asura, because almost none of the Game Masters have reducts. All we really need are kiels and mayaP's. LNS is a fun idea but scratch the GM fight thing.

Yeah, when Tick suggested this (long time ago) there was talk of a way to make a command so you could switch damage on/off. I think we accepted it, but I don't know where the topic is now, it was very old.

The problem here isn't so much actually losing a card, it's that many players don't have a choice but to decard and reslot; in fact most players are forced to because they can't have 20 separate weapons. And yes, losing a thanatos would be painful *cringe* Not to mention the tickets i foresee people making about how their friend lost their rare cards at the decarder, for which we could do nothing about.

Do you have a thanatos?

I can see we're all busy staying on topic and suggesting things to make this topic better, bravo. Sarcasm asside, would you stop blaming the GM's whenever an accepted suggestion isn't done in a week? There are dozens of accepted suggestions that need doing, some bigger than others, and only three developers. They have lives. I accepted this before.

You guys are losing sight of the original suggestion, which is to add a second Euro WoE DAY, not castle, which would likely mean the economy of the castle would be harder to increase, therefore less emps. We're not adding another castle anytime soon.

You know, we didn't change the classes right away. They were exactly as gravity made them, but with HR specs. I don't know where you're getting the idea that we've changed the classes. We've nerfed a few things on strong classes as we went.

Awh Somdada, take care :)

Quick answer to your question is: that's how it works here. And people do that here because they think it's worth it.

To get a better feel of what we're talking about, temporarily join a smaller guild who WoE's to take castles. Even a guild like RIP, who is capable fo breaking, cannot defend against the two largest guilds, or even a smaller party if they have a devo and a good breaker. That's how it is here. Skill really matters, that's why Trans went so far, but numbers matter too, they matter a lot, and so does gear. We can open a castle without drops, but no one would be interested. We're opposed to this because we want a stable economy, and we know from past experiences that this sort of thing will plunge it into hell. These powerful items aren't to be dished out lightly.