Sorrow Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 As a user of professor(fave class), i see no problem in allowing GTB; its been part of the game in here since like ever, despite my many complains. Yup GTB stops coma from the Tarot card, which is precisely why GTB is a must, no GTB allowed and you're asking to see many full taroting Clowns around, a professor and a wizzard(even a ninja and a soul linker) can work their way around GTB to some extent, but NO ONE can work their way around that instant kill clowns can do. If GTB isn't allowed, wait till you get a match up of Prof vs Clown and watch your bolts all coming back at you, Heaven's Drive and Thunder storm having no effect and Stave Crasher just tickling the guy...well...watch till you're coma'd at least, which won't take long. With how nerfed they are, i'd be really surprized someone actually using a priest in a pvp tournament; their best shot at winning would be a linked holy light spam, and not only 1 vs 1 already rules spirits out, they can still have their mojo nullified or turned against them, and well, champ vs sniper always has been the worst match up for a sniper, still snipers have really good chances against many other classes. The idea can be really interesting, just because our fave classes don't have much of a chance for being alone, it doesn't mean we can't choose another, more rounded out, class to take part in, or try it out on our fave for the heck of it. Just keep in mind that the class choice is yours, its not like anyone is saying "play sniper so we can defeat you easily with champs!" After all; people are always crying, even over the Broadcaster, "you can't win without gang! bwabwa D,:" There's the chance to get that solo fights everyone seems so hungry for. Besides, the admins have been doing a great job in balancing things out, who would've guessed Stalkers and Snipers would be so good to play now when you've tried them out before the Valkyrie weapons? Sooner than your think, the class you like the most might be more self sufficient. Its strange how people are using the argument "Rich get richer" and no one even thought of ruling out Thanatos card(OP rich people's exclusivity)and other very expensive/OP/rare items...or suggesting this tournament to be Non-donation only; anyone can gear up nicely for non-donation 1 week after joining the server with pure farming. TL;DR=Stop mopping and enjoy the ride, it'll be fun ;D You should be more worried in the ruling for the event rather than pointing 'everyone-already-knows' class match up scenarios. i don't see these things as good reasons for disagreeing with this idea. No offense to anyone, just try and look at the bigger picture, instead of making that silly little detail that doesn't suit you be a reason to turn down something that can be a lot of fun :3
Meka Meka Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 I like the idea, barring some refinements that probably need to happen. I think I'd only participate if it was generated randomly. It could be done through a PHP app or something, where players put their names in and it generates the matches, which could solve the authentication problem - you wouldn't need to take a video then.
Acetrainer Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 +1 -It's an interesting concept for a more 1v1 style of PvP which is usually unheard of on this server which i can agree with. But i cannot in the slightest agree with those prizes... -10 Points for Gryffindor.
Leaz Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 (edited) i like this idea! but maybe it will be better off having the same class vs the same class Edited June 6, 2011 by Leaz
Determination Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 (edited) I really like the idea of making this event a Non-Donation exclusive tournament. It will not just let the "not OP rich people" participate in this, but also new or not-so-new people. And the idea of making this tournament ND would make the Elite sets a bit more expensive, and make that long and difficult quest a bit more worthwhile. About the prizes, they have to be changed... the quantity of tokens asked are way too low, and I guess those won't be the real prizes (Those rare rucks and unreleased emps). I agree on this idea though, but it needs a lot of fixes. Edit: Same classes fighting each other sounds good too. Edited June 6, 2011 by Determination
Leaz Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 I guess those won't be the real prizes (Those rare rucks and unreleased emps). why can't those be the real prizes? the items are only rare because they are unreleased
Meka Meka Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 why can't those be the real prizes? the items are only rare because they are unreleased +1 (also wondering why).
TensaZangetsu Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 this event would benefit the most compared to Ladder/WoE/GvG being monopolize by a few unfair leaders, I'm not saying all but a few but when was the last time you've seen and old timer Mvp or hunt ygg? never right? Thats because its being monopolize by a group of people and look at drax for example. its a love and hate situation but i agree since this is the most beneficial event to to middle class and poor.
Weezing Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 this event would benefit the most compared to Ladder/WoE/GvG being monopolize by a few unfair leaders, I'm not saying all but a few but when was the last time you've seen and old timer Mvp or hunt ygg? never right? Thats because its being monopolize by a group of people and look at drax for example. its a love and hate situation but i agree since this is the most beneficial event to to middle class and poor.Why should we do the poor people duty, there is poor people for a reason.
TensaZangetsu Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 (edited) Why should we do the poor people duty, there is poor people for a reason.how is that poor peoples duty? thats the most common way to makes tokens for anybody and your post basically supports my facts saying " oh look, why do poors peoples work when we can monopolize woe gvg and ladder and never have to hunt speed tickets and mvp ever again woot woot!" and why you mad? cause i disagree to your last suggestion and expose your dumb tactics into getting agrees hahahahha? now go suck a big one! Edited June 6, 2011 by TensaZangetsu
Kittie Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 One thing - I think only one color emp should be released for this event, much like the annihilation event. The prices for the prizes should be increased significantly as well. As for the GTB thing, it should be allowed as well as orc lord cards. And non-donation only can be a seperate version of the same event. There shouldn't be a reason to exclude donation items - face it, its part of the gameplay on this server.
Weezing Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 What about if we spread the prizes in Donation and Non Donation and take away Aquaring Rs, to stay with something like this: Donation 1vs1 Tournament. Firering Rs: 6 1vs1 Donation Tournament Tokens. Red Emperium Aurora: 12 1vs1 Donation Tournament Tokens. Non Donation 1vs1 Tournament. Goldring Rs: 6 1vs1 Non Donation Tournament Tokens. Gold Emperium Aurora: 12 1vs1 Non Donation Tokens. Or something like that.
TensaZangetsu Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 champions should win if the opponent suicide using double orc lord. isn't fair to champions and this rule should only apply to them since this is there prime skills and have the highest damage
Mint Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 champions should win if the opponent suicide using double orc lord. isn't fair to champions and this rule should only apply to them since this is there prime skills and have the highest damage but then every-one would just go full out asura, and without the correct reduction gears will kill almost anyone. Especially seeing as its 1v1.
TensaZangetsu Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 (edited) but then every-one would just go full out asura, and without the correct reduction gears will kill almost anyone. Especially seeing as its 1v1.what are you saying? If champions go full asura they will get own unless you suck and didn't let someone full asura you before entering the event seeing if you could survive it or not. If you use double OL obviously your intention will result in a double death and therefore that wouldn't be fair and the champion, so they should win, but if its champ vs champ and they both die from OL then they both should be disqualified. Edited June 6, 2011 by TensaZangetsu
Genesis Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 The criticisms mentioned in this thread are valid. It is about whoever has the better gear. However, I have a suggestion. What about making it so you can only enter with 1 set. Whatever you have on is all you can use, you cannot swap between 10 different sets.
Determination Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 (edited) I guess those won't be the real prizes (Those rare rucks and unreleased emps). why can't those be the real prizes? the items are only rare because they are unreleased +1 (also wondering why). It's just a guess, I never said they can't. I think the only ones who decide which prize will be accepted and which won't are the administrators, the Head Game Master and PROBABLY Senior GMs. I'm not so sure. I agree with Kittie, I'd prefer just one emp being released or if it's two, give them out the way Weezing explained. And of course like I said in my first post, increase the price of this rewards. Oh and also, before I forget... players shouldn't be able to "register" in the tournament with more than one character per IP. If you know what I'm saying... Edited June 6, 2011 by Determination
Mint Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 The criticisms mentioned in this thread are valid. It is about whoever has the better gear. However, I have a suggestion. What about making it so you can only enter with 1 set. Whatever you have on is all you can use, you cannot swap between 10 different sets. I like. +1 *Baby Mint likes this*
Seraphine Posted June 6, 2011 Author Report Posted June 6, 2011 What's wrong with the prices on the prizes? You have to win 4 times to get an emperium,2 times for a ruck.
Genesis Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=970epu&s=7 Upon speaking with Seraphine, I came up with the above. As you can see, there is a rectangle and a rectangle inside the rectangle. The one inside would be for players to watch the battle going on. You cannot go outside the "viewing quarters" and vice versa. This will work on ANY map. Because these invisible walls can be added to any map (they are script based). Tell me what you guys think. Also, if you could go around the pvp_y and pvp_n maps and send us screenshots of maps you think would look good that would be a huge help. Again, there is no need to add new maps, there are a bunch of maps we aren't using! *Edit* The Tournament might also benefit from a NBA style system: http://www.printyourbrackets.com/images/nba-playoff-bracket.jpg Best 2/3. Any thoughts? =]
TensaZangetsu Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 GENESIS READ MY MESSAGES PELASEEEEEEEEEE!!!
Mr. Masochist Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 +1. Should be best of 5 or best of 10 obviously. Classes have their advantages and their disadvantages, you just have to find a way to climb over your disadvantages. Nothing wrong with allowing everything usable in the game in here.
Genesis Posted June 6, 2011 Report Posted June 6, 2011 +1. Should be best of 5 or best of 10 obviously. Classes have their advantages and their disadvantages, you just have to find a way to climb over your disadvantages. Nothing wrong with allowing everything usable in the game in here. I don't understand, do you mean to say it should be best out of 5? That seems like it would take a long time. In the NBA, if no one "sweeps" the other team (3-0) then it can go on till the 7th game. Is this what you mean? http://i.imgur.com/HHbP0.jpgThat made me laugh, hard.
