Rayray

it could make my WS bring about 750 ygg seeds so I can be ok with this. :p

300 Vit cuts way too much stat points that you could be putting on str to carry more yggs. your hp is no use if run out of berries. even if you master going to storage and getting yggs, chances are it will still be a millisecond late. and on clown/snipers strategy, strip is pretty much fail against them so your best bet is to break their stuff. you should also put up on how to combat WS.

I dunno why they type like that... looks like someone is cursing me

i wanted to add one suggestion though. make a command where we can reset the target of the skills that the SG uses. I dunno if reset skills does it though..

We tried everything on the marriage npc on fcity lol. The one in pront works though, so why not import those npcs to fcity?

playing FF underleveled is what makes it fun :p

I agree to everything, although I do not know if we can really fix heal/sanctuary.

stop using your fking set and card set that you use on ALL your characters. it won't always work

no, about half the server got GTB at that time and we do not have dragoon warlord. I do not have a problem having Stave, it is just that it would be too unfair to the wizards who owns the skill since profs could utilize it much better. And having more yggs would help me more than having stave. Example, he slaps on gtb and has fcp, you hit like 11k on stave. yeah you are fighting, but it won't make you win isn't it? With the state of GTB card right now, using a magic class to fight someone with GTB+FCP is either having too much bravery, too much ego or too much stupidity thinking you could win.

I TESTED IT WITH MY SN, I GOT ABOUT 200 SP AND I AM FINE. YOU'RE THE ONE WHO ISN'T READING OUR POSTS. What is your proof that SN doesn't have enough sp when I posted the sp costs of skills that is used most of the time? what, you got 50 sp? it doesn't fucking mean that if you made a suggestion, you are right and we are wrong. we are giving inputs on the matter. SN are way fine the way they are now than before. THEY AREN'T SUPPOSED TO BE GODS as Ryuk said. 2fbh has drawbacks, live with it. If we buff SN's sp when using FBH, then we have to buff up every other class that uses it and has sp below 250 just to be fair. and we do not want that. I do not know if you are that poor not to be able to ygg that much. if you are then farm yourself some ygg berries or seeds, they are easy enough to farm anyway. if not use blue pots or whatever. i can spam 4 skills on my SN before ygging, i do not know how you could not.

If only poring ball could be done again.. /sigh

No, you didn't explain the ones he quoted on me, when I put the sp cost of the skills you might be using. you wouldn't ygg every skill you do as you claim it to be. even with 100 sp, you would be able to cast up to 1 fb and 2 mammonites before ygging. Every other class who uses 2fbh got this problem unless they are int based classes(most noticeable on LKs, I ygg at about 3-4 bowling bashes/magnum breaks). SN got a lot of buffs for it already, I see a few guys that could hold their own in pvp using them(I believe you are not one of them). Making suggestion and then bashing on other people's opinion about it is STUPID. That is why it is called a SUGGESTION.

anyone who would be putting inputs on this matter? I believe that Super Babies are fine the way they are, no need for this.

Don't worry though, I do not flame people on their opinions. But I do enjoy a good exchange of arguments that is why I post :p

^ it would be nice to have that :) why not just the visual effect of fury if it doesn't help people?

^ sounds to me you are someone who suggest things when you cannot do them as good as others do. It is easy enough to switch items, you just need to learn how to do so. We do not need to babysit other people.

You are the one who said you aren't gonna argue anymore :) I didn't say there is no argument. lrn2read You joined the server when? I am here since 2007 so I think you would have never met the profs I am talking about :) Still, having stave crasher when profs can change elements and amplify its damage by 25% because of ground skills is unfair to the ones you are going to get the skill from, the wizards. With what you are saying, I see a lot more reason to buff up wizards, rather than buff up professors.

and you are only looking at the situations that would HELP YOU and not the community. what you said on profs was exactly what I had in mind when you made the suggestion. Profs could change elements and such which makes it NOT balanced for wizards since wizards cannot do all those(unless you count BoS but then profs got ground skills). You are a great prof. But sorry I have to disagree on you saying that you made the profs a "thing" in GvG. That is way Egotistic of you. You are still far behind the profs I met here ages ago. Those profs who didn't need to resort to suggesting a skill that would only help themselves.

lol I see some people actually do it at the same damn time. it looks like when they cast AV, JT and Tarot comes with it. and he looks like he was just standing LOL

then its not melee, i doubt you would hit people. your tactic is casting firebolt then if they change to gtb you use mammonite. then for sure, it ISN'T MELEE. you can use hollowring if you want. and... Firebolt sp cost= 10+ 2*skill level(level 10)= 30 sp Mammonite sp cost= 5 sp. Bash sp cost level 10= 15sp SO NO, YOU DO NOT YGG EVERY SKILL YOU CAST WITH 100 SP. Sorry I can be a smart ass whenever I want. With the SP costs shown now, your argument of having low sp that you can only cast one skill at a time before you ygg is invalid. The only explanation why your sp depletes so much is that you might be defaulting GTB card, if you are then DO NOT DEFAULT IT.

Then do not demand a skill then, unless you want to become a greedy little ass fuck dumbass. FCP counters profs strip, but that same skill makes stalkers and whitesmiths more useless then profs so I do not see why you are saying the other classes are balanced. Please read my reply thoroughly. I said I DO NOT SEE ANY HARM ON THIS SUGGESTION EXCEPT ON WHAT RYUK SAID(in case it is hard for you to read) I DISAGREE BECAUSE IT WOULDN'T HELP EVERY PROF USER, IT WILL ONLY HELP THOSE WHO GOT ENOUGH ITEMS AND CARDS TO BEGIN WITH,THUS MAKING OTHER PEOPLE STRONGER, BUT NOT MAKING THE PROF CLASS STRONGER AS A WHOLE. Just because you do not know someone who uses prof that has thana doesn't mean other profs doesn't have thana. so you fail at that point. I tried it with a wizard since I main wizard 2 years ago. Incant wouldn't help much regarding damage, putting agi for aspd which is needed to spam Stave is not efficient when only using incant since you lose a lot of stat points you could be putting somewhere else. 9k-11k damage on stave wouldn't help much. it will damage, yea but that is as far as it goes. they could approve it, it would help my prof, but I still rather have the weight increase for some reasons. and on this suggestion, I personally would want it to be on the staff and not the book. To be honest, wizards are more underpowered than profs. profs has the ability to kill a someone before he can slap on his GTB, something no wizard could do with his spells. that alone makes me think twice on the need for profs to get stave crasher. besides that, profs got dispell, wall of fog and safety wall, while wiz can only use safety wall as a defensive spell. On a 1v1 situation, magic classes are useless with GTB, I agree on that. but on other things like GvG, profs can do well in it, while wizards do less.

-_- then cast your buffs first before putting your 2x fbh shoes. and we thought you are going for melee baby so what's with the firebolt and mammonite. make yourself clear first. switch items dude, it is not that hard.

Profs are originally a support/offense class, not pure support but not pure offense either. Since this is a high rate, they became inclined more to the offense type. I do not see any harm on putting this except on what Ryuk said.(people would soon wanting skills that aren't originally theirs to begin with). Stave Crasher would only be useful with a Thanatos. Using incant and such with it, I doubt you would kill anybody with it. Only a few got Thanatos card, which means that if this suggestion went through, it will only help a handful of people, not the whole community who uses profs. So I disagree, since it would only help those who are strong already, not the whole lot of prof users. I'd rather have the increase weight limit.

Good luck guys. I do hope new GMs would be active and no one would try to abuse his/her powers.

200:1? crap that is not fair.. they should try hunting it so they would know