onetwothree Posted December 9, 2016 Report Posted December 9, 2016 NO Party and NO BABY immediate implementation in PVP. THIS NEEDS IMMEDIATE IMPLEMENTATION because this involves pvp toks that can be sold for forsaken toks and forsaken toks HAVE monetary value because they only come from the token shop. there's no denying that the pvp system is messed up. the #1 spot is occupied by the BIGGER party. not to mention they feed eachother to secure their spot. THIS IS OBVIOUS AND HAS BEEN HAPPENING FOR THE PAST FEW MONTHS (or probably years even before I started playing). Don't ask to post screenshots or videos. you should know the trend in the pvp and investigate it yourself. EVERY PLAYER who's interested in pvp KNOWS THIS -and the ones who will deny this are the ones who are benefiting from it. Just look at Kage Dan. #1 spot, -there was a time when his kills was 1200 and deaths was 2? AND YOU CALL THIS SERVER BALANCED? the conversion of pvp tokens to forsaken tokens is 1:700 so each week they get 7k forsaken tokens. (+2800 for their 2nd place and +700 for their third) so that's a total of 10500 tokens SOLELY to just one group of pvp players (or to be more specific, ONE GUILD) THIS IS THE SAD REALITY OF QUANTITY DOMINANCE IN THIS SERVER. You have new players trying to be competitive and take the end-game quests(Dragonist armor) but they can't because the market is dominated by opportunist players whod use their numbers to rank up and get filthy rich. SO MAKE THE PVP SINGLE ENTRY AND NO BABIES. babies are basically free cheaters. they pneuma, stand on traps, use sight, TROLL etc. this NEEDS to be included in the next update. 10.5k tokens to one group every week and still NOBODY would do anything about it. 1
ShadeIromatak Posted December 9, 2016 Report Posted December 9, 2016 +1 let's grow the server not hold it back
coldjoke Posted December 9, 2016 Report Posted December 9, 2016 +1... should make it like LMS, cant go inside with party on... and yea...baby is like LOLZ inside
Rayray Posted December 9, 2016 Report Posted December 9, 2016 We already discussed this; the solution that was accepted was there would be a pvp room with parties, and one without.
Ares Posted December 9, 2016 Report Posted December 9, 2016 Yet you post another topic about this AGAIN. Why complain now if the PvP setup has been there for years already? Don't make another topic regarding this since this has been discussed before and has an alternative solution already.
