jameslamela Posted July 12, 2013 Report Posted July 12, 2013 -1 many people will be confuse in WoE if every castle will be changed....
Hypnosis Posted July 12, 2013 Report Posted July 12, 2013 What purpose would this server other then slowing the players down.
ChainBreak Posted July 12, 2013 Report Posted July 12, 2013 Maybe castle rotation could be implemented. After one woe the castle is switched with another for the next woe then switched back. Like that having a castle is worth more and leaders can start using guardians and planning the defenses beforehand. This way it'll be harder to break. :3
hazbird123 Posted July 12, 2013 Report Posted July 12, 2013 (edited) i like the idea of changing 1 or more of the castles, or adding another once a week castle ^^ Edited July 12, 2013 by hazbird123
Rayray Posted July 13, 2013 Report Posted July 13, 2013 Changing castles every woe just makes it that the guild that owns a castle will have more time to get drops since by next woe, the castle might not be available thus have no need in defending.
villar01 Posted July 13, 2013 Author Report Posted July 13, 2013 thats why james i like to change castle because many people know the castle if we change new one no one knows and that will be fun new challenge .
plok123 Posted July 13, 2013 Report Posted July 13, 2013 (edited) I'd rather add more xD but on different days xD Edited July 13, 2013 by plok123
DonWasHereJelly Posted July 14, 2013 Report Posted July 14, 2013 if server has 1k player woe i dont mind adding a castle but server has less than 200 player to woe so why extra castle
etffbtw Posted July 15, 2013 Report Posted July 15, 2013 The old castle is way more better than todays castle ,weve been using these castle for too long time to change
Shino Posted July 16, 2013 Report Posted July 16, 2013 You didn't provide any useful argument on why we should change the castles when it has been working fine for most of the community. How can we consider changing the castles if we don't see any reason to do it?
Hypnosis Posted July 20, 2013 Report Posted July 20, 2013 I don't see any reason to change the castles, Experienced players already know the other castles and it's just gonna slow everyone else down. It's not really exciting, In my opinion.
zergling Posted July 24, 2013 Report Posted July 24, 2013 Old players? 99% of the "old players" have either left or been banned. The castles at the moment are kinda retarted. I personally would rather have different castles, simply due to the fact that the current castles are the most unused out of them all. On most servers the castles that are normally used are kriemhild/fadhgridh, hohenschwangau/neuschwanstein, sacred altar/scarlet palace, repherion/bergel/eyeolbrigger. This server they decided to use the most off the wall castles for woe, it's kind of retarted from what I have seen to be honest. There's few defensive positions that the current castles have(which is why they are almost never used) and this makes it very difficult for defending guilds to actually put up a hard defense. With the new emp HP there should be a revision of castles to allow guilds to better defend their castles, that way guilds will actually have to devote their team to attacking that one castle and not spreading their breakers between them all.
hazbird123 Posted July 27, 2013 Report Posted July 27, 2013 You didn't provide any useful argument on why we should change the castles when it has been working fine for most of the community. How can we consider changing the castles if we don't see any reason to do it? well ill provide one, EVERYDAY I hear people say they r bored at one point or another. Why not add a Tuesday woe with a new castle or something along those lines?
Genesis Posted September 3, 2013 Report Posted September 3, 2013 We rotate castles every few months, I think we won't be changing them for a bit.
