Nu0c Mam Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 baby classes should be allow in pvp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Millenia Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~*God Of War*~ Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 off topic but is thai nuoc mamm? :O and yes i love baby class :D so agreed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nu0c Mam Posted September 3, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 No i am not thai. I'm one of thai's cousin. Its just not fair that Higher classes could go in pvp but smaller cant D: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shono Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 Agreed ~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leaz Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 agreed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayray Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cirrus Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 yes please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nyanko Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 I have to agree also, it would be interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shono Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 If baby classes are allow. It'll be cool if a baby class was laddering. Heh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiago Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devotion Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 Ok I knew there was a reason we disallowed baby classes in PvP, and I couldn't put my finger on it. But now I know it's because they couldn't be attacked, but could attack back. And since babies are fully capable of killing trans classes, we removed it for fairness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terroryst Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 I remember bein' owned by other players when I played a baby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yuki Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 I agree as well; it'd be fun to watch baby classes own in PvP, especially if it's a war between baby classes V.S. transcedent/other classes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devotion Posted September 5, 2009 Report Share Posted September 5, 2009 Baby classes can't be attacked in PVP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiago Posted September 5, 2009 Report Share Posted September 5, 2009 (edited) Ok I knew there was a reason we disallowed baby classes in PvP, and I couldn't put my finger on it. But now I know it's because they couldn't be attacked, but could attack back. And since babies are fully capable of killing trans classes, we removed it for fairness. False. They have never been able to attack any other player in PvP. It apparently got changed because some people were using their baby novices to uncloak other people with sight in PvP while others couldn't attack them. Edited September 5, 2009 by Tiago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamersrule26 Posted September 5, 2009 Report Share Posted September 5, 2009 Baby classes can't be attacked in PVP. Cant anyone change it then ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flonne Posted September 5, 2009 Report Share Posted September 5, 2009 And from what I remember, it wasn't babies themselves. It was baby novices that couldn't be attacked. And yet, if you were to go to LHZ or anywhere that people usually PvP, you'll still see people doing that. It's a simple code that can be changed to allow people in PvP to kill novices/babies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terroryst Posted September 5, 2009 Report Share Posted September 5, 2009 Oh god yes allow us to kill babies/novices/baby novices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yuki Posted September 5, 2009 Report Share Posted September 5, 2009 I agree with allowing baby classes in, except for novices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cirrus Posted September 5, 2009 Report Share Posted September 5, 2009 Oh god yes allow us to kill babies/novices/baby novices.LOL. But yeah, my friend before had a Flee-type Baby Crusader and he was able to kill AND be killed. So I guess it really is a matter of those annoying Novices/Baby Novices. So, again, I agree with allowing at least the 1-1/1-2 baby classes. (Is that right? Lol.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shono Posted September 5, 2009 Report Share Posted September 5, 2009 LOL. But yeah, my friend before had a Flee-type Baby Crusader and he was able to kill AND be killed. So I guess it really is a matter of those annoying Novices/Baby Novices. So, again, I agree with allowing at least the 1-1/1-2 baby classes. (Is that right? Lol.) Idk man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Masquerade Posted September 6, 2009 Report Share Posted September 6, 2009 Baby classes can't be attacked in PVP. If you're going to act smart at least make sure you post the right thing, or be specific enough. >__>; Only baby novices can't be attacked. Back to topic: Agree. I miss PvPing with my baby sinx :\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devotion Posted September 6, 2009 Report Share Posted September 6, 2009 We removed Baby classes from PvP for a reason, I remember it clearly. And it applied to all baby classes, not just baby novices. So for now the suggestion is in limbo until we figure out if we can let babies back into PvP. No need to be snarky in all your responses to me, and I mean that in the nicest way possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiago Posted September 6, 2009 Report Share Posted September 6, 2009 Maybe we could be of better help would the GMs only tell us the omgsosecretreasonsforupdatingwhichwemayneverletplayersknowabout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
