Damascus Posted December 1, 2007 Report Posted December 1, 2007 1) No I'm not gay. 2) Not even a fag could love you.
Jer Flip Posted December 1, 2007 Author Report Posted December 1, 2007 1) No I'm not gay. 2) Not even a fag could love you. so u dont love me? :<
Damascus Posted December 1, 2007 Report Posted December 1, 2007 we still love you when you're not a bitch.
Ethereal Posted December 1, 2007 Report Posted December 1, 2007 And when you're not being Jer Flip. (:
Jer Flip Posted December 1, 2007 Author Report Posted December 1, 2007 we still love you when you're not a bitch. And how am I being a bitch? By backing up a person who has been falsely accused, and who is constantly taking mindless insults and flames from some fag who's mad because he didn't get the GM position/no one likes him?
Damascus Posted December 1, 2007 Report Posted December 1, 2007 And how am I being a bitch? By backing up a person who has been falsely accused, and who is constantly taking mindless insults and flames from some fag who's mad because he didn't get the GM position/no one likes him? Uhm, no one likes him is a funny insult for one. Milhouse is not being falsely accused of anything and you're not his parent by any means to be "backing him up" nor do you have proof of his innocence. Oh and please, define fag to what you see it as.
Jer Flip Posted December 1, 2007 Author Report Posted December 1, 2007 There's ample proof backing up Milhouse's innocence. For example, his GM application (which disproves the lying about his age.) There's nothing proving that he did what he's accused of, though. Faggot: person who is generally irritating/stupid. Clear enough?
Amalgamation Posted December 1, 2007 Report Posted December 1, 2007 Please stop this before it goes any further.
Damascus Posted December 1, 2007 Report Posted December 1, 2007 fag·got2 /ˈfægət/ - [fag-uht] –noun Slang: Disparaging and Offensive. a male homosexual fag·ot also fag·got (fāg'ət) n. A bundle of twigs, sticks, or branches bound together. A bundle of pieces of iron or steel to be welded or hammered into bars. faggot noun 1. offensive term for an openly homosexual man 2. a bundle of sticks and branches bound together [syn: fagot] verb 1. ornament or join (fabric) by faggot stitch; "He fagotted the blouse for his wife" 2. fasten together rods of iron in order to heat or weld them 3. bind or tie up in or as if in a faggot; "faggot up the sticks" Learn your definitions or at least go to dictionary.com before you try to use a word incorrectly. -It's been said he lied on his application on many things including age. He put down that he's 24 when he's clearly younger and nevertheless is his name George Zimmer? Sorry Amalga, I was on MSN with pat and got information based on Milhouse's app. just to figure out that Jer is incorrect. I'll stop now that I'm correct. ;x;
Jer Flip Posted December 1, 2007 Author Report Posted December 1, 2007 I know the literal definition of the word "faggot", but words aren't always used in the context. For instance, when your dad calls you a "son of a bitch", does he mean "son of a female dog"? -It's been said he lied on his application on many things including age. He put down that he's 24 when he's clearly younger and nevertheless is his name George Zimmer? And what do you support these assumptions with?
Damascus Posted December 1, 2007 Report Posted December 1, 2007 I know the literal definition of the word "faggot", but words aren't always used in the context. For instance, when your dad calls you a "son of a bitch", does he mean "son of a female dog"? And what do you support these assumptions with? The fact that pat has seen the applications. I use literal definitions for most if all of the words in our lexicon so I'll see a word used as "slang" by it's normal definition. By the way Amalgamation told us to stop.
Jer Flip Posted December 1, 2007 Author Report Posted December 1, 2007 The fact that pat has seen the applications. ...And?
Damascus Posted December 1, 2007 Report Posted December 1, 2007 ...And? Milhouse's application said he's 24 when he's clearly younger.
Jer Flip Posted December 1, 2007 Author Report Posted December 1, 2007 And how is he "clearly younger"? EDIT: Now that I think about it, the GM application said he was 17. This GM application was saved in sent items, so it could not have been edited.
Damascus Posted December 1, 2007 Report Posted December 1, 2007 And how is he "clearly younger"? EDIT: Now that I think about it, the GM application said he was 17. This GM application was saved in sent items, so it could not have been edited. On my 17th B-day I went with friends to see Live Free Die Hard, then I missed a wedding to go see Transformers while I was in Europe.
Jer Flip Posted December 1, 2007 Author Report Posted December 1, 2007 Learn how to read: his GM application said he's 17, not 24.
Damascus Posted December 1, 2007 Report Posted December 1, 2007 Learn how to read: his GM application said he's 17, not 24. I recall everyone saying it's 24 but whatever.
Jer Flip Posted December 1, 2007 Author Report Posted December 1, 2007 I read the GM application straight from Milhouse's "sent mail" box on his mail account. It's impossible that he edited anything, and it said 17.
Damascus Posted December 1, 2007 Report Posted December 1, 2007 Someone just told me it said 17 via. MSN, you're correct on that. But then Milhouse said he's 14 in game, then he said he's 24 and left it that way.
Jer Flip Posted December 1, 2007 Author Report Posted December 1, 2007 Someone just told me it said 17 via. MSN, you're correct on that. But then Milhouse said he's 14 in game, then he said he's 24 and left it that way. Who gives a shit about what he said in game? Word of mouth is easily sarcasm. The GM application said 17, and you can't really object, which means Milhouse isn't guilty of anything.
Damascus Posted December 1, 2007 Report Posted December 1, 2007 Who gives a shit about what he said in game? Word of mouth is easily sarcasm. The GM application said 17, and you can't really object, which means Milhouse isn't guilty of anything. Uhm, now you have to deal with the fact that he says: stayed in PvP says: most of the day says: barely did support says: never listened to what the higher Gms said and says: was known to kill people in pvp.
Jer Flip Posted December 1, 2007 Author Report Posted December 1, 2007 Uhm, now you have to deal with the fact that he says: stayed in PvP says: most of the day says: barely did support says: never listened to what the higher Gms said and says: was known to kill people in pvp. Uhm, now you have to deal with the fact that: 1. He barely did support? Zeitgeist does the worst support ever. I asked him a question, he didn't answer. I called someone in PVP a "fatass" (kiddingly) and he gave me a warning. Milhouse, however, is not retarded, knows what is serious and what is not, and generally answers accurately any question you have. 2. I never saw him kill anyone intentionally. May have missclicked and killed someone by mistake, but that doesn't really matter. 3. You have absolutely no proof to back any of this up. EDIT: my last post.
Damascus Posted December 1, 2007 Report Posted December 1, 2007 I've got no more to say since you're just persistent and incorrect trying to justify Milhouse's corrupt actions. And I'ma go to sleep.
Genesis Posted December 1, 2007 Report Posted December 1, 2007 Since it is regarding one of my colleagues ( or ex-colleague in this case), I would like to drop a small post, this is not to diminish ( nor insult) anyone or their feelings nor am I picking sides here ( I much rather stay out of drama such as this ); I repeat I am doing this because it is about the GM Team. The reason Milhouse got "kicked" was because of a simply misunderstanding; When this happened I got a PM from him which read this: " WTF why am I banned? I can't logon my GM!" My reply was " Strange, stay put I'll solve this problem." ( At which case I blocked him from MSN for a short amount of time to find the reason for his recent booting in peace) ; clearly ignoring what I had said he went and told fellow players these massive assumptions on how I staged this whole "underground scheme" , in order to get him kicked; when in reality I was the one helping him. Not only did he say/claim to have seen every GM being lazy and/or messing in PvP all day long ( Which I ironically is what he did) he even said he could prove some these abusive actions; claiming that Colagua @spawned stuff for himself ( Irony strikes again; @spawn is a Level 30 and Above command which Colague is not. ); as well as other fable tales about each and every GM. So you see, the real culprit behind Milhouse's removal from GM was himself, something he openly admitted. PS: To stay on topic I would like to state that I am not gay. =]