L. Priest Mace [Up Damage Maybe]

[Rayray]

I'm not sure but what if we put a chance(LOW CHANCE) for zen fury and asura on the weapon? that way we eliminate ifrit rings and makes them damage a little better. Or is that too much?

[-Si-]

Yes! I love this talk haha, you all know how I feel. I +1 to all your suggestions. L. Priest mace and Eagle Strike needs some improvement.

[benchiiie]

Put chance for coma like in the book. That'll definitely own people /gg

[Hypnosis]

I'm not sure but what if we put a chance(LOW CHANCE) for zen fury and asura on the weapon? that way we eliminate ifrit rings and makes them damage a little better. Or is that too much?

That's not a bad idea but if that's the case I'd hope it was still a low chance, at least that way they can have back their accessorys

[Bishop]

I've thought about that too Rayray. Am curious to see what the rest of the community says about it.

[-Si-]

I agree to Ray's suggestion. It really takes out a lot of preist power when they have to depend on ifrit rings.

[benchiiie]

lol. putting zen-fury-asura chance there will definitely ruin the class. make a Champ instead. =_=

and one more thing. even with ray's suggestion, MATK is still wasted. maybe put some chance of bolts?

[Rayray]

lol. putting zen-fury-asura chance there will definitely ruin the class. make a Champ instead. =_=

and one more thing. even with ray's suggestion, MATK is still wasted. maybe put some chance of bolts?

Battle priest already revolves around the chance to asura on the ifrit rings, how can that ruin the class? This is for battle priest, not holy light priest or full support priest.

The mace DOESN'T NEED MATK since it is for battle priest. Chance for bolts? Didn't that suggestion of yours contradict your statement of not wanting the chance to asura? Because if you want the chance to bolt, make a melee prof then.

Remove the matk on the mace since it is not needed and put %atk instead, put around +100 hit to remove the need for phreeoni card, and add a small chance to cast zen-fury-asura to remove the need for ifrit rings. I think that should solve all the problems. And i don't like the idea of putting coma on the weapon, we already have book of dead for the coma, no need to put it in the weapon that deals good damage already just to force GTB on people. We already have clowns with tarot for that, no need to put it on another class imo.

[benchiiie]

the r

Battle priest already revolves around the chance to asura on the ifrit rings, how can that ruin the class? This is for battle priest, not holy light priest or full support priest.

The mace DOESN'T NEED MATK since it is for battle priest. Chance for bolts? Didn't that suggestion of yours contradict your statement of not wanting the chance to asura? Because if you want the chance to bolt, make a melee prof then.

Remove the matk on the mace since it is not needed and put %atk instead, put around +100 hit to remove the need for phreeoni card, and add a small chance to cast zen-fury-asura to remove the need for ifrit rings. I think that should solve all the problems. And i don't like the idea of putting coma on the weapon, we already have book of dead for the coma, no need to put it in the weapon that deals good damage already just to force GTB on people. We already have clowns with tarot for that, no need to put it on another class imo.

the reason i suggested to add chance of auto-casting bolts is for MATK not to be null. since both L.mace and Strike Eagle has additional MATK, we can just add bolts to occupy the full potential of the weap. MATK + ATK is a good combination, and yet, it's not that OPd. and if you're aiming only with the ATK with the asura, it can be easily countered by reducs

and one more thing. if you'd take a look with the L.Book, it has MATK and ATK counterparts depending on the target. if the target uses usako, use HL. if uses GTB/Maya(or full reflect equips), easily go to stave type.

that's why i'm getting another way for L.mace and Strike Eagle to be potent no matter what the enemy uses with bolts.

Edited July 7, 2013 by benchiiie

[Rayray]

the r

the reason i suggested to add chance of auto-casting bolts is for MATK not to be null. since both L.mace and Strike Eagle has additional MATK, we can just add bolts to occupy the full potential of the weap. MATK + ATK is a good combination, and yet, it's not that OPd. and if you're aiming only with the ATK with the asura, it can be easily countered by reducs

and one more thing. if you'd take a look with the L.Book, it has MATK and ATK counterparts depending on the target. if the target uses usako, use HL. if uses GTB/Maya(or full reflect equips), easily go to stave type.

that's why i'm getting another way for L.mace and Strike Eagle to be potent no matter what the enemy uses with bolts.

This is one of the reason why I suggested that the Strike Eagle+L.mace to get rid of the matk. We already have a weapon that caters for matk. Why make it so that the battle priest play like battle prof when the latter does better at doing auto bolts?

In fact, if we put what we suggested to the weapon. Reducts or not, the battle priest will deal good damage with the weapon, auto- asura or not. For example, If I put Thanatos card on that weapon, the enemy will be forced to keep on switching cloaks everytime he see the the priest on fury already. There are tons of ways to win with the weapon we suggested, the lex aeterna alone poses a huge threat, the only thing missing is the damage for battle priests since they have to use ifrit rings.

Personally, I do not want the auto bolts on the weapon of the priest simply because it will be a waste of my money if I bought the strike eagle just for it. I can go auto bolts+ decent damage on a battle prof using even just Book of Dead. and I will probably deal better damage than a priest with auto bolts enable valk weapon on that prof.

[benchiiie]

well, i'm satisfied now with ray's (+1!)

it's good to know that if ever that's implemented, it'll be just a low chance of lex to occur, which doesn't take over the champs who can cast 2 asuras every 3 secs.

good argument ;)

BUT!!

and one more thing, maybe add SP instead (or both a little amount of HP&SP) as long as there's an additional SP.

since HPs of these types would rather go Full asura whenever this is implemented.

AND ONE MORE THING!

ray, i'm talking about the L.Book as a very flexible weapon to any situations(either ATK or MATK)

and L.Mace being not. but, i guess you were right there suggesting adding chance of zen-fury-asura instead of bolts :)

end of the story.