Makeing Another Castle For Woe 2.0

[Kinglance]

Their are 4 huge guilds for woe 2.0 and only 1 castle and 2 of the guild have an alliance. It is barley a hair of a chance for any other guild to get it. We need another castle.

[Boogieman]

I'm not disagreeing or anything but isn't it still in beta mode?

[Xtopher]

If you want to get another castle put in your best chance is making a suggestion in the actual suggestion thread, not the general discussion thread.

I'm inclined to disagree with you though. We simply do not have enough active players in this game to justify another WoE 2.0 castle.

Also, as Boogieman said, WoE 2.0 is still in its beta stages. There could still be major changes in the future... so releasing another castle at this point could lead to more confusion for players and more work for the GM team later on.

[kuoch]

It is ridiculous seeing 2 big guilds allied together, yes. But that doesn't solve anything, if you add more castles. Thats only going to add/change the economy on the rarity of the drops of 2.0. So, no. Go form a guild and band against the 2 guilds, and give it a try at taking it. Plus, I've always liked it better seeing 1 castle and having the whole server run inside of it. But at this rate, theirs only 3 big major guilds hitting it. Not including the free lancers.

[Xtopher]

I don't see how a single guild alliance is relevant to the topic of adding more castles.

Adding another castle would require there to be a lot more active WoE players on this server than there is.

[Nadtorious]

In my opinion. I like it like this ~ its more challenging !!

[Procastinate]

better do add on euro woe rather on 2.0

[strawboy]

YE. What's the points of WOE 2.0 if we add another castle o.o Wouldn't it be nonsense.

And just like Procastinate said, its better to add in euro but not in 2.0 :l

[supream]

that shining emp of mine is somewhat done. you could always put that into another woe castle i guess. but ive been told it would break the economy.