supream Posted October 31, 2010 Report Posted October 31, 2010 second time this happened. why is it when i make certain topics, people rant about other things that dont pertain to it and it gets closed without anyone solving the issue i suggested.
OverRated Posted October 31, 2010 Report Posted October 31, 2010 RANNNNTTT RAGGGGGE!!!!!!! man i feel you i saw your topic being legit and everyone trolls on it
Xtopher Posted November 1, 2010 Report Posted November 1, 2010 Maybe you need to specify in the original post more clearly. Ask people to stay within X conversation and not to deviate from it. "This is about X, please withhold all comments about Y." However, with things like suggestions there is a lot of spillover effect into other things.. changing/implementing one thing can have really great or really horrible effects on other things. Newtons third law: For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. or am I off-topic talking about physics?
supream Posted November 2, 2010 Author Report Posted November 2, 2010 (edited) All of it was relevant...the things you guys said was irrelevant to the sp boost. Maybe you need to specify in the original post more clearly. Ask people to stay within X conversation and not to deviate from it. "This is about X, please withhold all comments about Y."However, with things like suggestions there is a lot of spillover effect into other things.. changing/implementing one thing can have really great or really horrible effects on other things. Newtons third law: For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.or am I off-topic talking about physics?maybe if the community lacked buffoonery, i wouldnt have to specify my topic so you guys wouldnt deviate from the matter at hand. i hope everyone playing isnt 3 years old who needs directions on every single detail. Edited November 2, 2010 by supream
Terroryst Posted November 2, 2010 Report Posted November 2, 2010 Awww, I'm sorry we didn't babyfeed you your LK buffs.
supream Posted November 2, 2010 Author Report Posted November 2, 2010 (edited) hello, im 16 not 3, use grownup words not your normal baby dribble. you should know more then anyone i know how to play lk. i felt as if the apparent stats of the lkh wasnt enough compensation for lowering damage and removing coma. Edited November 2, 2010 by supream
Terroryst Posted November 2, 2010 Report Posted November 2, 2010 If you know how to play LK, then you'd be fine with just weapon with higher attack. Which is what the new LK spear did.
supream Posted November 2, 2010 Author Report Posted November 2, 2010 but you dont think the people who donated for what they saw dont deserve a little bit more compensation (as in more sp from the weapon) then what they are getting now?
Xtopher Posted November 2, 2010 Report Posted November 2, 2010 old stalker soaring(20% or 15% idk) + kings shield and usak(55%)=75% or 70% off the back. new stalker soaring(5% so ive been told) and friggs shield and usak(60%)= 65%. so even with the new shield stalkers dont have as much reduces as they did before. but with the kings shield now they only have 60%. thats without the sgw and poring hat. but even so combat knife + friggs shield + usak + sgw + poring hat + the other middle head gear= 98% reduces. its not 100% but its still not fun for anyone trying to kill them. starts to get cheap over time. ^I like how you get angry at us for talking about other LK attributes in your SP thread when you are adding up false/ill-informed reduction numbers in a FCP nerf thread lol. Anyway, I'll be sure to only comment at the very specific topic at hand when you post from now on supream.
supream Posted November 2, 2010 Author Report Posted November 2, 2010 (edited) ^I like how you get angry at us for talking about other LK attributes in your SP thread when you are adding up false/ill-informed reduction numbers in a FCP nerf thread lol. Anyway, I'll be sure to only comment at the very specific topic at hand when you post from now on supream.those numbers are accurate. i go off by what i am told. i assume u do the same right? use some math skills that you may have. if you dont have any i apologize for assuming you do. i was responding to the previous post, and my post wont get the topic close like how your posts did mine. Edited November 2, 2010 by supream
Xtopher Posted November 2, 2010 Report Posted November 2, 2010 Your numbers are inaccurate due to lack of knowledge or any personal first hand experience with the class. Old soaring bird for stalker gave 20%, new one gives 15% not 5%.... And it won't stack with Kings shield the way you've described it. You should be sure your information is accurate before you go rambling off on how a class needs to be nerfed. I go off of what I know first of all, then what I am told from reliable sources (the GMs/Admins), not some second hand rumors from other players. In response to your questioning of my mathematical skills: I'm about to obtain a Bachelor of Science in Finance and Economics... I'm pretty sure my math is on point. ^All of this is offtopic of this thread by the way, I don't know why you brought it up if you're so picky about people deviating from YOUR topics. I wasn't looking for a debate on stalkers here, I was pointing out that you also go offtopic in other threads. The post above yours in the "Balance Suggestions" thread deviated from the topic somewhat when mentioning reductions just as others deviated from your topic about SP. Yet, you continued the discussion of reductions even though you knew it wasn't the topic of the thread... just as others continued discussion of spiral pierce and coma in your SP thread. I'm not trying to start some big argument or flaming, please spare me that... I'm just trying to point out that sometimes thread topics about class suggestions have a lot of spillover because in a way almost everything is linked together and changing one thing can have a domino effect. If you want a controlled discussion of topic x you should be very specific about that in the original post.
supream Posted November 2, 2010 Author Report Posted November 2, 2010 i applaud good conversation, but in this case you guys were ranting in the wrong section. giving good input on a class wont get a topic close. you guys ranted on who could play or not which got mine closed.ive seen the stalker soaring bird and ask people who had it. since this is the rant section of the forum, there really isnt a topic set for this post.
Xtopher Posted November 3, 2010 Report Posted November 3, 2010 I agree with you on ranting. I don't believe I ranted about anything but clearly some people were. Some people are really selfish when topics of class change are mentioned... it's all about how its going to effect them directly. Thus they would really do/say anything to negatively effect the suggestion... highly annoying.
Terroryst Posted November 3, 2010 Report Posted November 3, 2010 new stalker soaring(5% so ive been told) and friggs shield and usak(60%)= 65% I don't know how that math works out.
