Well, this is interesting. To be honest I don't see why you guys are so worked up about this.
Anyway.
First of all, I don't see the reason for the ad hominem attacks on Char. Okay so she's been gone for awhile but she's been back for a month now. It doesn't take much time to realize what is wrong with Ladder. Completely disregarding someone's opinion because of this is just dumb. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Just because it doesn't agree with yours doesn't mean you have to get so butthurt.
Now onto my opinion.
Let's take a look at the past 2 ladders as an example. Last week was 1)Java 2) Nila 3) Dadron3. Java (Drew) wins because of his gang. Peter, Mike, and I are on most of the time to help him ladder plus others. Nila (Cole) can do just fine because he's geared out the ass and can wreck the gang above with a few swift FAS not to mention he is on most of the time anyway. Dadron3 got on there because he was in PvP so often and probably tried harder than anyone else to ladder. Maybe he didn't go about it the best way and maybe he did end with like 300:500 ratio but still at least he put the effort in. So with your rule Dadron would be out and so would the next guy. Who does that leave? Oh Fernando, the guy who fed with like 5 ungeared characters for hours once late at night. So technically he would be out too. Finally it comes to Excellent~, the guy who quit laddering after the first week. Now the point of this long explanation of the obvious is how ridiculous it could get from this rule. 3-5 would all be dropped leaving 6th place as the winner. And this is an exception of a week seeing as the top 6 all have over 100 kills. Most times the 6th place person could have as low as 50 kills.
The week before this ended up as this:
1) Java 2) Nila 3) Prophecy
Once again Java- win because of gang
Nila- gang and solo fas owning.
Prophecy was helping Java gang.
Oh and they all had kds of like 3:1 or better.
So for three reasons I disagree with this.
A) It could get stupid like if it were in place last week. People as low as 6th, maybe lower, could end up in 3rd. This encourages laziness on ladder if someone like Dadron3, who works hard even if he failed, decides to ladder.
B) What would this even change? If you check out the latest ladder you'll see Java, then Nila, then some other dude. omg what a surprise!!!!!!! who would have thought those two would be winning again. And as usual they have perfectly good ratios. 3rd place is probably going to be fine as far as his ratio goes since he edps every time you try to touch him. So in the end this rule may make a difference here and there for 3rd place but the big money makers of 1st and 2nd are probably going to be unaffected.
C) If you haven't noticed a common theme between Java and Nila's good ratio-they both either have a gang or solo because of snipers being pretty dominant.
This rule I believe encourages more ganging and/or super buffs to kill 5-6 people then edp out of there. With a need for better kd in all aspects it forces so-called unfair PvP. What better way to avoid dying than getting a nice gang with a pally, prof, clown, etc to help you out? Or if you don't have friends who want to help ya out why not just dual client a pally and a ws and go to town on PvP. You'll probably get 5 kills if the 1st place person's gang is there and probably semi afk because PvP is dead. You can probably avoid dying altogether just by drinking some EDP. I feel like this suggestion makes full buff randoming and ganging even more of a problem and discourages people from actually trying hard to get kills in PvP (like Dadron).
P.S. I've laddered twice on my own and am on my third ladder with Java so don't even say I don't know what I'm talking about ;)