Lets put it this way :
Skoll
[ Gypsy, Clown ]
Decreases vit defense by a further 20%, totalling [60%]
Max HP + 25% ( + 6% ) i.e: 130k = 170k.
(or 15%, since 2 skolls can be used)
+
Assassin Cross :
Enables use of Level 3 Cloaking.
[ Gypsy, Clown ]
+ 30% resistance against Neutral property
+gr/rsx armor --> you wouldnt survive full asura in anycase .
OR
Skoll
[ Gypsy, Clown ]
Decreases vit defense by a further 20%, totalling [60%]
Max HP + 25% ( + 6% ) i.e: 130k = 170k.
(or 15%, since 2 skolls can be used)
+
Skoll
[ Gypsy, Clown ]
Decreases vit defense by a further 20%, totalling [60%]
Max HP + 25% ( + 6% ) i.e: 130k = 170k.
(or 15%, since 2 skolls can be used)
+gr/rsx armor --> you wouldnt surive .
OR
Assassin Cross :
Enables use of Level 3 Cloaking.
[ Gypsy, Clown ]
+ 30% resistance against Neutral property
+
Assassin Cross :
Enables use of Level 3 Cloaking.
[ Gypsy, Clown ]
+ 30% resistance against Neutral property
+gr/rsx armor --> you wouldnt surive and it wouldnt be fair coz you wouldnt have the debuff .
IF , instead of thinking about cloak cards , you think more at making tao more powerfull for gypsies/clowns and you put something like :
gr+tao ( +60 or 70% on gypsy/clown )
+
2devs -->im sure you can surive asuras and if you switch to skolls trust me you will have MUCH more than 130k hp vs other classes which arent champs/palas .
Only you would need fcp .. but you would be balanced .