forum123 Posted October 7, 2013 Report Posted October 7, 2013 Well i was wondering about the effect of prof rings so i tried using both... Prof lessed has in game description of having 35% +matck compared to Prof curse which only has descrip of 20%matck.... But as far as im concerned, the effect of prof bless is useless coz it does not follow the said effect.. I think it's unfair compared to prof cursed which gives better maatck and gives additional damage on stave... I suggest why not have separate effect? Like if u want %mactk make it on bless.. If you want %onattack put it on curse... just like on other rings.. Example, Sin bless are for normal attackers while Sin curse are fore SB type.. something like that.. Hope you do something about it tnx:)...
Kayla Minerre Posted October 7, 2013 Report Posted October 7, 2013 Well i was wondering about the effect of prof rings so i tried using both... Prof lessed has in game description of having 35% +matck compared to Prof curse which only has descrip of 20%matck.... But as far as im concerned, the effect of prof bless is useless coz it does not follow the said effect.. I think it's unfair compared to prof cursed which gives better maatck and gives additional damage on stave... I suggest why not have separate effect? Like if u want %mactk make it on bless.. If you want %onattack put it on curse... just like on other rings.. Example, Sin bless are for normal attackers while Sin curse are fore SB type.. something like that.. Hope you do something about it tnx:)... Hmmm, I haven't used either, but it would make sense. As far I'm aware, isn't Atk+% useless anyway? Stave Crasher is Matk based unless it's been changed recently. Perhaps have them something like Blessed: Matk+ 35%, Stave Crasher Damage+ 10%, Cursed: Matk+ 10%, Stave Crasher Damage+ 35%, or maybe more/less stave crasher damage/matk depending on the conversion rate of %age to damage. I'm not entirely certain how the damage formula goes for it. With this, both will be useful, but each one will be focused on a type of attack.
Shy Posted October 7, 2013 Report Posted October 7, 2013 I think you have to follow the stats that is on the forum, the following below. http://www.forsaken-ro.net/forum/index.php?app=ccs&module=pages§ion=pages&id=1&record=140 If I think blessed is underpowered? Yes, so make the cursed. For the topic whatevs. Your comparison with the sinx blessed and cursed was kind bleh, because in my opnion cursed is better either way, if you going critical or sb. Why? Figure out by or self, the time i have spend on doing my test is worth more than just tell you why the curse is better than blessed. Peace!
forum123 Posted October 8, 2013 Author Report Posted October 8, 2013 That's what makes Prof blessed useless... So what's special with the ring anyway? none?.. What;s the point of having this ring?... I mean, it really is useless no matter how you look at it...
sartorius19 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Posted October 9, 2013 separating effect for stave on the rings would be not be good. why? cause weapons already has the differentiation of which. in line with this, voluspa gives 60% more stave damage that is not present on profhighness. differentiation on effect in stave on wring would just make the prof more expensive class as it is now. + separating effect would affect staving. why? because, 1st, ull have to switch another gear when stave/ ;2nd, if u cant afford both ring, ull be stack on bolting / staving. in which wont be enough to last in a battle. unless certain conditions are met. and to answer the 20% attack on cursed ring as to effect on stave damage. yes stave is based on matk but remember that it is still a physical attack in which attack would make a difference. thats why fbh and tg and other cards are used like other class. But making blessed ring have better stats is not a good idea. but as to how it should be done, i have no idea atm.
