mindsweeper Posted August 24, 2011 Report Posted August 24, 2011 (edited) Hello again! I just want to follow up my suggestion because the topic is rejected and closed and players can't comment their thoughts.. is it that bad that you closed it right away? honestly I find it rude... the following is what I want to say regarding my suggestion.. here's my suggestion for ur reference: http://www.forsaken-ro.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=20345&pid=232988&st=0entry232988 1. Based on my experience, since i'm a newbie here, farming for several items for a QUEST is hard.. it will HELP ALOT of players farming and doing quests... 2. Why is the reason of the GM is my suggestion isn't a viable option? can you elaborate pls? if the reason is you could use @autoloot and drop the items you don't need, THEN try to review some of the quests.. some are 3k 1k etc.. and it will cause more trouble and time dropping the items that you don't need, since the quest itself is very time consuming.. 3. SINCE newbies obviously can't do anything but to do the quests, you should help/support them more! (I'm a newbie, some players are newbies.. It will help/attract some players) 4. many players agreed on my suggestion, and there is no downfall for it and I can't think of any.. so why not implement it? maybe my main point is WHY NOT? :D there pls post your comments.. correct me if i'm wrong i'm open minded :D Edited August 24, 2011 by mindsweeper 1
Old Navy Posted August 24, 2011 Report Posted August 24, 2011 yea and since theres already alootid slot 1 why not add? even regular players agree... because as i newbie is very hasstle to @autoloot 100% just to aloot 2 or more things... pls think about it... xD 1
Veracity Posted August 24, 2011 Report Posted August 24, 2011 Please make sure to read the suggestion rules before posting in the suggestion section. Your suggestion violated the last rule, specifically: Do not suggest skill edits or anything that would require source editing. We know it's not ideal, but since it can't be done at this time, try to be creative and work around it (e.g., suggest item/card effects, etc.) What you suggested would require source editing. It was suggested before and rejected; you should also check the rejected suggestions section before making a new one to prevent this from happening. If you ever need further clarification on why a suggestion was rejected, you can always feel free to PM me. The GM who rejected your suggestion was just following/enforcing the rules of the suggestion thread, not trying to be rude, that's all. (: That being said, we'll try to look into this more as we might be able to do this now. I do think it's a nice and thoughtful suggestion and agree with it 100%, the question is just whether or not it's doable at the time.
Seraphine Posted August 24, 2011 Report Posted August 24, 2011 (edited) Hello again! I just want to follow up my suggestion because the topic is rejected and closed and players can't comment their thoughts.. is it that bad that you closed it right away? honestly I find it rude... the following is what I want to say regarding my suggestion.. here's my suggestion for ur reference: http://www.forsaken-ro.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=20345&pid=232988&st=0entry232988 1. Based on my experience, since i'm a newbie here, farming for several items for a QUEST is hard.. it will HELP ALOT of players farming and doing quests... 2. Why is the reason of the GM is my suggestion isn't a viable option? can you elaborate pls? if the reason is you could use @autoloot and drop the items you don't need, THEN try to review some of the quests.. some are 3k 1k etc.. and it will cause more trouble and time dropping the items that you don't need, since the quest itself is very time consuming.. 3. SINCE newbies obviously can't do anything but to do the quests, you should help/support them more! (I'm a newbie, some players are newbies.. It will help/attract some players) 4. many players agreed on my suggestion, and there is no downfall for it and I can't think of any.. so why not implement it? maybe my main point is WHY NOT? :D there pls post your comments.. correct me if i'm wrong i'm open minded :D I closed it for a reason as Veracity stated. Edited August 24, 2011 by Seraphine
Decode Posted August 25, 2011 Report Posted August 25, 2011 I consider this is solved already. A quick resume for the player: Your suggestion was closed and sent to rejected suggestions, for the simple reason that it included source editing and if you look up in the Suggestion forums rules you shall see that you should not suggest anything that requires source coding or editing as Veracity stated. Thank you for your understanding, don't see this as if we did not like your suggestion, I myself consider it is a good suggestion but it is against the rules of the suggestion topic since we won't do source editing. Hope to see you around the suggestion topic some other time with some new suggestions to help the server improve :]. Closing this topic and setting it as solved.
