Terroryst Posted October 23, 2010 Report Posted October 23, 2010 [ SOTW #39 Voting ]- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Theme : Kodak Photo - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Details : This is the voting thread for SOTW #39, Kodak Photo. Vote for your favorite signature and hope they'll win! Note : Image used- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Welcome to the voting thread of the thirty-ninth SOTW of the year! When voting in the SOTW, we will be expecting you to fully understand the rules. Don't know the rules? Click Here. Rules that the voter must understand:Voters must have at least a post count of 10 in order to vote. Voters must give at least 2 or more valid sentences to vote. Contestants may not vote for themselves in any way, shape or form. A judge's vote will count as 1 point. 2 non-judges' votes for a specific entry will be considered 1 point. Votes will be counted at the end of Sunday. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Prizes1st Place: 100 Event Coupons2nd Place: 50 Event Coupons3rd Place: 25 Event Coupons- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Entries: [ 1 ] Lenneth Celie IGN: Lenneth Celie [ 2 ] nines IGN: Thesik Bellamorte [ 3 ] Mr. Masochist IGN: Mr. Masochist [ 4 ] Roky IGN: Roky [ 5 ] -Rei IGN: Cronus [ 6 ] xonchu IGN: xonchu [ 7 ] Poringly IGN: S&H. [ 8 ] Muffin Master IGN: Krztaszma Good luck to everyone, and please vote fairly.
nines Posted October 24, 2010 Report Posted October 24, 2010 Im going to vote for #8. Only one that seems to have a major change added to the stock doesn't stay in the range of prediction of what you'd expect to see done with the stock, has a pretty nice theme to it to. Of course I love to critique so I will. Seph you could try working on smaller stuff. Doesn't really seem fit to be a signature. I know my shit sucks even tho its small but it just seems more fitting for use etc. But you always got good choices on how to edit etc just like I said x.x. In jealous of you tho :( always better than my crap lol
Poringly Posted October 24, 2010 Report Posted October 24, 2010 I think im gonna vote for [ 3 ] Mr.Masochist, Because i like the 2D Pokemon that look like real thing, && It also got a small border which make's it look like a video clip ( I don't really know that to call it so yeah, Sorry ). & It's simple but on the same time, awesome. It's also doesn't really add anything much, but it's nice in some way ( If you get what i mean ). :3 Just hope this is valid. @__@ Idk if i had enough reason alrdy.
Guest xonchu Posted October 24, 2010 Report Posted October 24, 2010 i would just like to comment. This week's theme will be a photo-manipulation competition ^ some didnt follow, yet accepted.
Terroryst Posted October 24, 2010 Author Report Posted October 24, 2010 Manipulation can mean anything from warping, cropping, adding, and smudging all alike. I merely stated manipulation because I gave you a set photo and you had to make a sig out of it.
Guest xonchu Posted October 24, 2010 Report Posted October 24, 2010 from what we learned in school and in my online school in editing, they saw the entries and told me not all are photo manipulated. Yes, its correct that we have a photo from kodak as the souce. but its not right to stay as it is as a hole. yes those smudging,etc will be implemented if it is worked out right. Photo manipulating is to make the photo a bit illusionary or for the photo to be enhanced in a different way. simple glow/addon/cropping is not even really good when it comes with manipulating. even mine was tagged "a simple photo manipulation". i would like to suggest to upload the tutorial or the PSD/file on how they created the signature. in making SOTW, theres no such thing as simplicity in making the sig but theres simplicity with the outcome. i guess what u meant about photo manipulation is different - to simply just edit.
Hannah Posted October 24, 2010 Report Posted October 24, 2010 I vote for [ 8 ] Muffin Master. I love the effects and the black, white, and red colors of the sig and it look like someone painted it with the splats and stuff, so yeah, I like it. :)
-R e i Posted October 24, 2010 Report Posted October 24, 2010 from what we learned in school and in my online school in editing, they saw the entries and told me not all are photo manipulated. Yes, its correct that we have a photo from kodak as the souce. but its not right to stay as it is as a hole. yes those smudging,etc will be implemented if it is worked out right. Photo manipulating is to make the photo a bit illusionary or for the photo to be enhanced in a different way. simple glow/addon/cropping is not even really good when it comes with manipulating. even mine was tagged "a simple photo manipulation". i would like to suggest to upload the tutorial or the PSD/file on how they created the signature. in making SOTW, theres no such thing as simplicity in making the sig but theres simplicity with the outcome. i guess what u meant about photo manipulation is different - to simply just edit. Now I feel like mine isn't manipulated.
Terroryst Posted October 24, 2010 Author Report Posted October 24, 2010 from what we learned in school and in my online school in editing, they saw the entries and told me not all are photo manipulated. Yes, its correct that we have a photo from kodak as the souce. but its not right to stay as it is as a hole. yes those smudging,etc will be implemented if it is worked out right. Photo manipulating is to make the photo a bit illusionary or for the photo to be enhanced in a different way. simple glow/addon/cropping is not even really good when it comes with manipulating. even mine was tagged "a simple photo manipulation". i would like to suggest to upload the tutorial or the PSD/file on how they created the signature. in making SOTW, theres no such thing as simplicity in making the sig but theres simplicity with the outcome. i guess what u meant about photo manipulation is different - to simply just edit. Some people may say it was manipulated, some may not. Perhaps you are right on your last statement though, that I meant simply to edit it, but like they say, "Beauty is in the eye of its beholder."
nines Posted October 24, 2010 Report Posted October 24, 2010 Xonchu the only one who looks like they ever followed a tutorial is you, seph, and jay. And don't try to act high and mighty because you learned something from a class...so does everyone else who takes a class you don't got to come in and be a straight up douche bag about it. It's obvious that most of the people who enter don't know what there fully doing just entering because for example I made a fkin stick figure with my off hand on fukin paint and won like first place.....people vote for the dumbiest shit here don't vote of quality so I don't know what your complaining about. Seems to lean in everyone elses favor. Except for seph. Shes just to pro not to vote for <.<
Terroryst Posted October 24, 2010 Author Report Posted October 24, 2010 Alright alright lets tone it down a notch. This is a voting thread. I haven't used a tutorial in months, by the way.
-R e i Posted October 25, 2010 Report Posted October 25, 2010 Hey, so we're going to win 100 Event TOKENS?!?! YEY!
Guest xonchu Posted October 25, 2010 Report Posted October 25, 2010 im complaining about some didnt do such "photo manipulation". and now i know that he meant is editing only. im not being "high and mighty" i just told all about what i thought this competition would mean. No offense to anyone.
Terroryst Posted October 25, 2010 Author Report Posted October 25, 2010 Pardon the extended voting period, I had work and whatnot. Closed.
