Ethereal Posted March 5, 2010 Report Posted March 5, 2010 (edited) For the mini RAW's, I was thinking we could use this sprite: Image Link ( the won't work for me for some reason ): http://i47.tinypic.com/xkn4td.png Source from: http://www.happy-graphic.com/headgear.php ( Focus your attention to the smaller version of the wings, not the large ones like we have implemented into our server. ) I thought it'd be a neat and cute thing. Edited March 5, 2010 by Ethereal
Devotion Posted March 5, 2010 Report Posted March 5, 2010 ^that's what they're going to be. Kittie's already recolored it to white to it matches any palette.
Guest icy Posted March 5, 2010 Report Posted March 5, 2010 Maybe. Or maybe they should make it back to 30%. HEH. <3
Schwalkzvad Beowulve Posted March 5, 2010 Report Posted March 5, 2010 RAW 30%, or AT LEAST 25%. 20% doesnt give that much. Vote RAW 15%.
Shadi Posted March 5, 2010 Report Posted March 5, 2010 For the mini RAW's, I was thinking we could use this sprite: Image Link ( the won't work for me for some reason ): http://i47.tinypic.com/xkn4td.png Source from: http://www.happy-graphic.com/headgear.php ( Focus your attention to the smaller version of the wings, not the large ones like we have implemented into our server. ) I thought it'd be a neat and cute thing. The link does work. you just have to copy and paste the link. these forums automate an url function meaning they are screwing up the link unless you edit it yourself to make it an proper clickable link. Also personally I prefer the middle size above the small ones but both look awesome.
Dudu Posted March 6, 2010 Report Posted March 6, 2010 Also personally I prefer the middle size above the small ones but both look awesome. Yeah I prefer the Middle size too..Its not that i dont like the small ones but for being a votin item the middle size looks hotter ;]
xBiscuit Posted March 7, 2010 Report Posted March 7, 2010 If we have a small version of RAWS, could we get one of SGWs too instead of fluffy wings. lol. And, it looks like we're debating between 25% to 20%? flip a coin. I don't really think a 5% difference is worth debating about. Or, just start a poll and see what the server votes.
Fall2Pieces Posted March 7, 2010 Report Posted March 7, 2010 srsly? 30%?? is too much. 15-20% is enough. Case Closed, :D
Schwalkzvad Beowulve Posted March 7, 2010 Report Posted March 7, 2010 Before the raw was fixed, I think the user feel that it's okay. It was 30%. and people are already used to 30% reflect on raw, and it was not a problem. So I think we should not go lower since 30% doesnt give any problem.
Requiem Posted March 7, 2010 Report Posted March 7, 2010 Before the raw was fixed, I think the user feel that it's okay. It was 30%. and people are already used to 30% reflect on raw, and it was not a problem. So I think we should not go lower since 30% doesnt give any problem. I thought it was a problem... 90% reflect on an LK seems too much to me.
Contain Posted March 7, 2010 Report Posted March 7, 2010 It really isn't if you can berry fast enough.
Kittie Posted March 8, 2010 Author Report Posted March 8, 2010 An LK would have to sacrifice a Tao Gunka card to get that 90% with two OLs - decreasing their HP. It's not like pallies who can get 90% reflect with only one OL.
Schwalkzvad Beowulve Posted March 8, 2010 Report Posted March 8, 2010 It actually gives different style of playing. otherwise it'd be boring. =(
bossapoy1 Posted March 8, 2010 Report Posted March 8, 2010 Disagree ... they just want an easy Ladder
Guest icy Posted March 8, 2010 Report Posted March 8, 2010 An LK would have to sacrifice a Tao Gunka card to get that 90% with two OLs - decreasing their HP. It's not like pallies who can get 90% reflect with only one OL. I thought shield reflect was 40%, wouldn't that make it 100% That makes no sense. Lol, i<3Ken
rinrin Posted March 8, 2010 Report Posted March 8, 2010 (edited) That makes no sense. Indeed. I'm still for 20/25% for raw (preferably 25) and 10/15% for vote wings (preferably 15?). Edited March 8, 2010 by rinrin
Contain Posted March 8, 2010 Report Posted March 8, 2010 Disagree ... they just want an easy Ladder Huh?
Kittie Posted March 8, 2010 Author Report Posted March 8, 2010 I thought shield reflect was 40%, wouldn't that make it 100% 90%, 100%. You get my point tho. D:
Contain Posted March 8, 2010 Report Posted March 8, 2010 Before the raw was fixed, I think the user feel that it's okay. It was 30%. and people are already used to 30% reflect on raw, and it was not a problem. So I think we should not go lower since 30% doesnt give any problem.
Danny Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 Disagree ... they just want an easy Ladder .................................... What chu talkin bout Willis???
Adamxd Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 An LK would have to sacrifice a Tao Gunka card to get that 90% with two OLs - decreasing their HP. It's not like pallies who can get 90% reflect with only one OL. Lk has got much more hp than pally.
Devotion Posted March 10, 2010 Report Posted March 10, 2010 And pally has more defense than LK, therefore take less damage by sacrificing tao for xOL. We'll make the RAW 20-25% and vote RAW 10-15% ~Accepted~