Royal Angel Wings

[Kittie]

As we all know. RAW was changed down to 10% reflect to match the description, thus significantly decreasing it's effectiveness and subsequently, value.

This was changed because people wanted it to match the description of 10%.

My suggestion: Change it back to 30% and just change the description to say 30%.

[Contain]

I totally agree, RAW is a hard item to obtain and its worth 3~3.5k. I liked it better when it was 30% because it was more effective to use.

[Anarii]

I agree. Honestly, it won't even be worth using to me now.

[Superman^*]

Agree, since soon, we can get a new "raw" in vote rewards.

[Kittie]

Yay! Agree-ers.

Edited March 4, 2010 by Kittie

[Terroryst]

I disagree, it's the only reflect wing there is out there so 30% sounds like a lot. Hi, Kittie. :3

[DeathZyte]

Same here.. Agree. It should be changed like 30%.

[Contain]

I disagree, it's the only reflect wing there is out there so 30% sounds like a lot. Hi, Kittie. :3

They adding vote reflect wings.

[Kittie]

I disagree, it's the only reflect wing there is out there so 30% sounds like a lot. Hi, Kittie. :3

The vote wing will be another reflect wing.

[Devotion]

What about a compromise of 20%

[Superman^*]

25% plz

[Anarii]

20% sounds fine, and the initial 10% for the vote ones I guess.

[Kittie]

I'd go for 25% for RAWs, and 15% for the vote versions.

10% is very little. It's not like the SGW where the reduction is taken from the full damage amount. This reflection is taken after reductions is considered.

[Devotion]

Ok look, it's like this.

1) Players complain about how RAWs should be 10% reflect because that is what they were meant to be.

2) We change it to 10% and now everyone suddenly doesn't like it (mixed messages, we're pretty confused)

3) We Change it to 20-25% and then players will say that we should increase sacred effects so that it's more than its vote equivalent.

So what is it going to be?

[Kittie]

I think more people agreed to give stat boosts to SGW since there was a vote counterpart, so I don't see the problem with the difference in RAW vs the vote version.

[Anarii]

Uh, leave sacred, it's fine.

20%/15% for RAW/ Vote wing.

[Dudu]

Ok look, it's like this.

1) Players complain about how RAWs should be 10% reflect because that is what they were meant to be.

2) We change it to 10% and now everyone suddenly doesn't like it (mixed messages, we're pretty confused)

3) We Change it to 20-25% and then players will say that we should increase sacred effects so that it's more than its vote equivalent.

So what is it going to be?

Well i think 20% For Raws and 10% to the "Votation Raws"

Lets make it fair ;]

[Spanky]

Why did J disagree? Is it because you flatten yourself by my reflekt? Noob. LOL.

[nines]

20% seems fine enough seeing how u can get like 170% reflect or some shit <.<

and if your going to change these to just cause all the "Pro's" use them and just all whore ols and call them selfs good by smashing the ygg button.

Why not make the Sgw 15% :O so the Reduct crazies can get equal treatment lololol

[Contain]

25% on RAW should be good. SGW is fine as it is.

[Guest icy]

I agree. Honestly, it won't even be worth using to me now. Sigh...

[Anarii]

If SGW needs a buff, don't make it an increase in %, stats instead. But personally I don't see that it does.

[Superman^*]

Stay on topic!! We are discussing about RAW effect.

[Anarii]

stfu noob.

jk. :3

[xBiscuit]

Change it to 20%, the same as SGW.

We get them the same way.

And I don't get why RAWs are worth more, when they're acquired the same way.

RAWs price = SGW price

Edited March 4, 2010 by xBiscuit