orthikuss Posted July 6, 2009 Report Posted July 6, 2009 example: sinx need osiris then phreeoni, stalker need phreeoni then osiris. become, sinx--> osi-phree (unchanged). stalker--> phreeoni-pharaoh. or sinx--> osi-phree stalker--> osi-pharaoh (unquest mvp card) high priest--> dark lord-FBH (unquest mvp card) champion--> dark lord-gloom (unquest) LK--> doppel-OL pally--> doppel-OH (unquest) or OH-doppel/RSX (unquest) unquest MVP card: amon ra atroce beelzebub detale FBH gloom GTB ifrit kiel ktullanux tanee mistress OL pharaoh RSX tao thana TG valkyrie vesper egnigem cenia d warlord d wizard skoll
Groxy Drank Posted July 8, 2009 Report Posted July 8, 2009 If i were the 1 who takes the dessicions i would leave it like its now but thats just my oppinion im not the only player here.
Devotion Posted July 16, 2009 Report Posted July 16, 2009 This is the kind of thing that, once it's done, it wouldn't be fair to change. For example, during our GTB debates about nerfing it or not, we decided that to reduce the drop rate of GTB to something below 1% wouldn't be fair; we started Fro with GTB, so why remove the chance to get freely for new players. The same is true in this case. Hopefully that made sense. -Rejected- PS: I'm sure we'll find a use for those MVP cards you've listed.
