death... Posted April 8, 2009 Report Posted April 8, 2009 In my opinion, It would be better if Kate Beckinsale is in the last sequel of Underworld.
Millenia Posted April 8, 2009 Report Posted April 8, 2009 I watched the new Underworld movie last night, the movie is set in the past before Selene was turned into a vampire by Victor - it explains what happened between Viktor's daughter ( Sonja ) and Lucian. When I noticed it was just showing what happened in the past I was just like, ugh fuck this, not interested. What's the point of having a movie about the past when the other 2 movies had already briefly gone through what had happened? @_@ Once the movie nears the end you realise why it was created. In underworld 1&2 you believe the Vampires are 'good' and the Lycans 'bad', even though you know both are as bad as each other the Vampires seem to have good attributes. In the third movie Lycans are nothing but slaves to the Vampire, they protest against the Vampires, Lucian and Sonja fall in love and Sonja becomes pregnant, Viktor finds out and kills his daughter right infront of Lucian, he qqs turns into a werewolf and tries escaping, Lycans charge the castle, Lucian kicks Viktors butt (or so it seemed qq). It then brings a huge question mark of who actually is the good side, tbh now I think it's the Lycans which I didn't while watching the other 1-2 movies. Also explains why Viktor made Selene his daughter and lied to her, funny though how she ends up killing him because he tries killing her Lycan lover. Rly, it's just a repeat of everything that happened with his real daughter. Idkk, could've been better.
Cale Posted April 8, 2009 Report Posted April 8, 2009 In my opinion, It would be better if Kate Beckinsale is in the last sequel of Underworld. Well she is...sort of.
Icarus Posted April 9, 2009 Report Posted April 9, 2009 I haven't seen the third movie yet but I loved the first two :D
